cybersecurity

OpenSSL vs. BoringSSL: A Comparison of Security and Performance

OpenSSL and BoringSSL are two of the most widely used cryptography libraries in the world, both providing essential encryption and secure communication services to millions of websites, applications, and devices. While both libraries are widely trusted, they differ in important ways when it comes to security and performance. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the two libraries and compare them in terms of vulnerabilities, performance, and source code.

OpenSSL: A Hall of Shame for Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

OpenSSL is a widely used open-source cryptography library that provides secure communication for many websites and applications. Despite its widespread use, OpenSSL has suffered from a number of critical vulnerabilities over the years, exposing sensitive information and putting the security of millions of users at risk. In this article, we’ll take a look at some of the most famous OpenSSL vulnerabilities. Heartbleed (2014) - One of the most famous OpenSSL vulnerabilities of all time, Heartbleed allowed attackers to steal sensitive information, including passwords and encryption keys, from memory.

BoringSSL: A Record of Vulnerabilities and Security Concerns

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL, created by Google, that aims to provide a more secure and performant cryptography library. Despite its focus on security, BoringSSL has suffered from a number of critical vulnerabilities over the years, exposing sensitive information and putting the security of millions of users at risk. In this article, we’ll take a look at some of the most famous BoringSSL vulnerabilities. Cloudbleed (2017) - This vulnerability allowed attackers to steal sensitive information, such as passwords and encryption keys, from memory.